If you use Twitter for politics, you may have encountered an odd faction styling themselves as “MAGA Communists”. While parsing out a coherent worldview from these people can be difficult, the simplest explanation is that they are followers of livestreamer Haz, whose combination of Marxist theoryceldom, brash and aggressive debate style — often against leftists and liberals — and advocacy for geopolitical rivals of the United States has won him a dedicated following online of leftists who felt alienated by the direction of leftist discourse online toward what might be described as “wokeism”.
Really enjoyed this post, especially the discussion on the universalist vs. particularist approach to national sovereignty (which I didn't even expect going in). The proof is in the pudding with the MAGA Communist's success on the Palestine issue, and nationalists who continue to ignore this will continue to preach to far more limited audiences (believe it or not, the uninitiated masses are much less receptive to supremacist ideologies of domination than they are to simple moral messaging of universal sovereignty). The natural reaction for most people today (bathed in liberal universalism) who learn the reality of racial differences is a desire for separation and autonomy. That is simply where White people are--so even from a purely practical standpoint of converting new people, the segments of the right that reject this are wrong (independent of their philosophical errors).
Even though this is a look at MAGA Communism, it really is a great primer for newcomers to nationalism. By highlighting the issues with Marxism, and exploring how Russia and China are scarcely "Marxist", it becomes clear that a critique of capitalism from the right in no way necessitates a proclivity for nor an alliance with "communism". That MAGA commies fall back onto debunked "Third positionism was controlled and staged by capitalists and the liberal west" arguments whenever pushed further shows their intellectual bankruptcy. The brittleness and inflexibility of their ideology to deal with these sorts of challenges belies its inherent internal fragility.
Truly though, the anti-White animus held by MAGA communists is the ultimate death knell, and Hinkle's/Haz's feckless attempts at defending the genocidal anti-White Julius Malema of South Africa shows how hollow and inconsistent their arguments really are. Even their anti-Zionism is framed in the most cringe anti-White way possible, despite the multitudinous negative effects that ordinary Americans suffer from being beholden to this foreign ideology. Ironically, the fact MAGA Communism is brimming with browns ends up bolstering (again) basic nationalist beliefs that people are naturally tribalistic and ultimately end up coalescing with their co-ethnics at the end of the day.
Funniest part of the piece is referring to them as leftists...you just know Haz is gonna seethe when he reads that lmao
Keith, the reason why they only critique Zionism but not the people behind it is because this is basically what the "tankie" i.e., Stalinist version of Communism allowed. The USSR was anti-Zionist because they realized that the Jews were abandoning Communism for it. Choosing Trotsky over Stalin and the USSR. Now, modern day Russia is far more pro-Zionist because the Trotsky faction won out with Andropov and Gorbachev detonating the USSR to effect "Convergence" with the West and to accept ideological Zionism. Yeltsin and Putin accelerated this trend. But Russia still allows a Communist-style critique of Zionism. The man in charge of Russia's online propaganda efforts is named Kiriyenko and he is an old-school Communist who had a grandfather in the secret police, very close to Lenin. He is the one who hires people like Hinkle or Haz.
I've written a lot about it and I know you know your stuff about Marxism as well.
Perhaps we could have a conversation about all of this someday.
Sadly, the most relevant series of essays is behind a paywall. If you subscribe to the blog, I can comp you and you will be able to read them. Let me know.
Extremely disappointing piece. You've taken the approach of a meta-commentary instead of actually wrestling with Marxism-Leninism, which by the way, is all these people claim to be. There is no such thing as a theory of Maga Communism, it is a slogan. The theory is Communism as applied to America.
A strange, terminally online ideology to rival the femboy Nazis and libertarian furries.
The main benefits we on the Right should look for in the movement should be:
A) Moving discourse away from liberalism/neoliberalism
B) Hopefully raising discourse (both online and IRL) to discuss things like German Idealism and World Systems
Aside from that, they sound like the orthodox Marxists of yesteryear, who were actually quite ascetic and “conservative” compared to the out-and-out degeneracy of there social democratic counterparts.
OK, he is some mystery meat mutt. My bad. Him playing the whole internet commie role, touting Soviet Symbolism had me fooled.
Regardless, that clown is one of the lowest IQ political commentators in the internet, and how people take him serious is difficult for me to comprehend.
Most Slavs are OK with me, I get along well with Easterners, lived in the region for a while. But! the commies, whoever they are, wherever they are, need to be treated with little more than contempt and ridicule. Even engaging them in serious political debate is laughable, they are a bunch of illiterate sloganeering fools with zero substance to the points of views they promote — like Hinkle.
It’s like the people who decry censorship, then ignore all the good certain world leaders are doing because a few things they do not like about them, but ignoring much worse being done by more malicious actors — which I see A LOT of in the online political Right wing.
Also: Arabs now promoting a jewish ideology while being ‘anti-Zionist’ is hilariously cringe; and I think a big part of the false opposition paradigm being created — where we are all being presented the false choice of Zionism and Nationalism lite, or Communism and Internationalist Muttoid Populism for the hordes.
It really does seem like our side with some exceptions, are the only ones who really understand what's going on. Like you said, even Arabs who have suffered at the hands of the jews physically for decades, can't bring themselves to see the forest for the trees.
I find Eastern Europe in general to be a very complicated place. So many political nuances that most people outside of Eastern Europe wouldn't understand.
Fully agree. When Haz popped up on the scene I was intrigued at first, I genuinely thought that some common ground could be found, but my mistake. I honestly don't know why I ever thought that. Haz has this conspiritard tier analysis of history. And yeah, him and his followers are as anti-white as can be. Which of course they are. Haz is an invader himself. I think what really convinced me was Haz lying about what's going on in South Africa.
"For liberals and leftists, only Nazism is real. Politics, left to its own devices, flows and bends in the direction of Nazism. The political spectrum, for them, is defined by gradations of resistance toward this fatal, primal, and vital conclusion."
Such a telling quote. "Left" and "Right" aren't actually about political-economy or any such bloodless questions of prudential procedure. Sinister and Dexter are the Machine against the Organism. Glamour against Beauty. Necromancy against Vitality. Death against Life.
The only question for them is thus: Is it Vital, Primal, and Living? Then it is Fascist and Forbidden!
"Advocates of MAGA Communism start to sound indistinguishable from Alex Jones as they explain how Wehrmacht generals serving in NATO after the Second World War, or Nazi scientists being adopted by the United States, demonstrates some kind of ideological continuity between National Socialism and post-war liberalism. It’s difficult to tell how much they actually believe it and how much they think it’s just a handy way to discredit liberalism to stupid people, but all it accomplishes is making everything stupider."
Are you unfamiliar with the history? It is pretty dumb to call others stupid and making everyone stupider while expressing complete ignorance of the factual and well-documented continuity between the NSDAP and the post-war power elites.
Who do you think funded the Nazis? For that matter, who taught them, who did they learn from? Hitler got funding from America and England, and pretty much everyone who mattered had a stake in him and his government.
As philologist Victor Klemperer wrote, there was hardly a single unique thing about the Nazis and pretty much every word they used, every idea they had, was not original, but had its origins in tiny troupes previously unknown or in German Romanticism, which is also the common origin of both Nazism and Zionism; it is hardly a stretch to make the comparison when one considers that Hitler read from Herzl, who was well-known in Vienna at the time, and got the idea of the "global Jew" from him. Zionists were one of Hitler's biggest influences and without them, there would be no Nazis or Hitler as anyone knows them.
Hitler was also an Anglophile, and the Nazis had countless American and English teachers to learn from regarding their policies and ideology. It is hard to imagine the existence of Nazi eugenicism without the works of the greatest eugenicists that were all British or American, like the Huxleys; UNESCO co-founder Julian even coined the term "transhumanism" the moment eugenicism went out of vogue, and it has the same meaning.
Nazis were pioneers of cybernetic government as well, despite the term not being coined until after WWII by Weiner: “Cybernetics, which I derived from the Greek word Kubernetes, or steersman, the same Greek word from which we eventually derive our word governor.” Cybernetic government is the model system for global government of many so-called liberals, Pierre Trudeau being one of the most famous to openly use the term, as well as of many at institutions of global power like the WEF.
Canadian nationalist Michael Ehret did an excellent series of articles summarising some of the above continuity:
The direct continuity and parallels in ideology and governance should really be obvious. The goal was always global governance, using scientism as a tool to create a priestly caste and make people believe "the snow is black" as Lord Bertrand Russell put it, and to control people through it and its advancements. Nazism was a failed experiment that ultimately made things more difficult for the people who funded, taught, and created them, and so they had to rebrand everything, like how Bernays did "propaganda" to "public relations" after Goebbels made it ugly. They are materialist Malthusians who want complete reality control, population control, every kind of control; cybernetic governance.
Of course Western leadership recruited Nazi scientists, and the Wehrmacht leadership to help fight the Russians. They still even support Nazis almost openly, e.g Canada has a war veterans' group for former Nazis that even still has a website, although I doubt many living members, and helps train the Azov Battalion in their ¨fight against the Semite untermenschen." None of this is "conspiracy," but documented historic fact.
And this isn't at all inconsistent with them calling people Nazis, or how they now culture warriors rather than nationalists, because those with real power are amorphous in ideology and will use any beliefs of the public to affirm their own in pursuit of accomplishing their goals. They will survive changes in ideology and adapt, no problem. Under Hitler they were nationalists, today they are globalists: yet they never did believe in states to begin with, seeing them as impedance to effective rule, hence why Wells and others wrote essays against them. Ideology is meant as distraction for the plebs, who are better divided, that way they can go uncontested as they consolidate their rule everywhere and only teach the art of real politics to their own kith and kin.
If you think all this is "conspiracy" for "stupid people" that "makes us stupider", I can only conclude you are not a serious author and are unconcerned with fact.
In case you missed that last little bullet point in their "platform" about Epstein and his "associates/Criminals," that would consist of Donald Trump himself as the primary target... This should have been your first clue as to how unserious they are. That and the absurd notion of "abolishing big tech". i understand (but don't agree with) the communist/marxist/woke-ian desire to destroy anything that you can preface with the word "big" but they would be nowhere without big tech, because "little tech" means going back to xeroxing fanzines at Kinko's (an American photocopy store which might have already disappeared) at 3 AM right next to the Jehovah's Witness guy with his bus shelter tracts.
Here's hoping that Lavrov and Dugin wake up and realize that these guys are an ideological trap that the American Foreign Policy Establishment is allowing to connect with Russia solely for the purpose of discrediting either dissidents or Tucker and the people who were awakened by his interviews and reporting in Russia.
Here's hoping that this helps as a White Pill for actual Third Position guys.
After carefully considering your point, but knowing full well that you lie out of your ass to such a comical degree that you would call the sky pink even if it were clearly blue, your opinion is to be rejected. Especially when your lack of info (but dearth of Vincent Law, Roy Batty shit stirring) is coupled with your agenda pushing (How's Riley's dick?)
I think the only reason Dugin is looking toward Haz and Hinkle now is because American nationalists have become too anti-Russia in his eyes. But also, American nationalists are retarded. But it's whatever at this point. I don't like the Kremlin, they are clearly anti-nationalist. But I also don't have any love for the ukrainian government either. Even so called nazis in Ukraine are a little weird to say the least. All the jews they have in their groups. Whenever they are interviewed they cuck out and say "oh these are just tattoos. We aren't Nazis, Russia are the real Nazis.".
Really enjoyed this post, especially the discussion on the universalist vs. particularist approach to national sovereignty (which I didn't even expect going in). The proof is in the pudding with the MAGA Communist's success on the Palestine issue, and nationalists who continue to ignore this will continue to preach to far more limited audiences (believe it or not, the uninitiated masses are much less receptive to supremacist ideologies of domination than they are to simple moral messaging of universal sovereignty). The natural reaction for most people today (bathed in liberal universalism) who learn the reality of racial differences is a desire for separation and autonomy. That is simply where White people are--so even from a purely practical standpoint of converting new people, the segments of the right that reject this are wrong (independent of their philosophical errors).
Even though this is a look at MAGA Communism, it really is a great primer for newcomers to nationalism. By highlighting the issues with Marxism, and exploring how Russia and China are scarcely "Marxist", it becomes clear that a critique of capitalism from the right in no way necessitates a proclivity for nor an alliance with "communism". That MAGA commies fall back onto debunked "Third positionism was controlled and staged by capitalists and the liberal west" arguments whenever pushed further shows their intellectual bankruptcy. The brittleness and inflexibility of their ideology to deal with these sorts of challenges belies its inherent internal fragility.
Truly though, the anti-White animus held by MAGA communists is the ultimate death knell, and Hinkle's/Haz's feckless attempts at defending the genocidal anti-White Julius Malema of South Africa shows how hollow and inconsistent their arguments really are. Even their anti-Zionism is framed in the most cringe anti-White way possible, despite the multitudinous negative effects that ordinary Americans suffer from being beholden to this foreign ideology. Ironically, the fact MAGA Communism is brimming with browns ends up bolstering (again) basic nationalist beliefs that people are naturally tribalistic and ultimately end up coalescing with their co-ethnics at the end of the day.
Funniest part of the piece is referring to them as leftists...you just know Haz is gonna seethe when he reads that lmao
Keith, the reason why they only critique Zionism but not the people behind it is because this is basically what the "tankie" i.e., Stalinist version of Communism allowed. The USSR was anti-Zionist because they realized that the Jews were abandoning Communism for it. Choosing Trotsky over Stalin and the USSR. Now, modern day Russia is far more pro-Zionist because the Trotsky faction won out with Andropov and Gorbachev detonating the USSR to effect "Convergence" with the West and to accept ideological Zionism. Yeltsin and Putin accelerated this trend. But Russia still allows a Communist-style critique of Zionism. The man in charge of Russia's online propaganda efforts is named Kiriyenko and he is an old-school Communist who had a grandfather in the secret police, very close to Lenin. He is the one who hires people like Hinkle or Haz.
I've written a lot about it and I know you know your stuff about Marxism as well.
Perhaps we could have a conversation about all of this someday.
Thanks for the comment. Wasn't familiar with your writing but will definitely be checking it out
Sadly, the most relevant series of essays is behind a paywall. If you subscribe to the blog, I can comp you and you will be able to read them. Let me know.
Keep up the great work Keith!
"Many followers of this ideology are immigrants and non-Whites living in the West." -- should be an opening sentence.
like 3/4 of maga communists are RT leftists, jimmy dore crowd, radicalised bernie bros (Hinkle was bernie supporter) so no suprise they are antiwhite.
Jimmy Dore is in no way anti white, and he has a relatively pro white audience if his comment section is any indication.
He was, but after the left tried to "me too" him he is now less hostile to the right
Magacommunist destroyed.
Extremely disappointing piece. You've taken the approach of a meta-commentary instead of actually wrestling with Marxism-Leninism, which by the way, is all these people claim to be. There is no such thing as a theory of Maga Communism, it is a slogan. The theory is Communism as applied to America.
What's their to wrestle? It's just a corpse.
communism is nothing but the left wing arm of zionist power. There is nothing to defend, it is garbage. Gentile ideologies are the only path forward
A strange, terminally online ideology to rival the femboy Nazis and libertarian furries.
The main benefits we on the Right should look for in the movement should be:
A) Moving discourse away from liberalism/neoliberalism
B) Hopefully raising discourse (both online and IRL) to discuss things like German Idealism and World Systems
Aside from that, they sound like the orthodox Marxists of yesteryear, who were actually quite ascetic and “conservative” compared to the out-and-out degeneracy of there social democratic counterparts.
Trump will complete the system of German idealism.
I have been ridiculing Hinkle for the oxymoron of "MAGA Communism" since last year. For anyone interested: https://www.bitchute.com/video/0rnqN5XtnuBe/
Also, that Haz meathead is a 70 IQ slav that is borderline mentally retarded. xD
He's not a slav, he's an arab. Don't slander slavs in such a way.
OK, he is some mystery meat mutt. My bad. Him playing the whole internet commie role, touting Soviet Symbolism had me fooled.
Regardless, that clown is one of the lowest IQ political commentators in the internet, and how people take him serious is difficult for me to comprehend.
Most Slavs are OK with me, I get along well with Easterners, lived in the region for a while. But! the commies, whoever they are, wherever they are, need to be treated with little more than contempt and ridicule. Even engaging them in serious political debate is laughable, they are a bunch of illiterate sloganeering fools with zero substance to the points of views they promote — like Hinkle.
It’s like the people who decry censorship, then ignore all the good certain world leaders are doing because a few things they do not like about them, but ignoring much worse being done by more malicious actors — which I see A LOT of in the online political Right wing.
Also: Arabs now promoting a jewish ideology while being ‘anti-Zionist’ is hilariously cringe; and I think a big part of the false opposition paradigm being created — where we are all being presented the false choice of Zionism and Nationalism lite, or Communism and Internationalist Muttoid Populism for the hordes.
It really does seem like our side with some exceptions, are the only ones who really understand what's going on. Like you said, even Arabs who have suffered at the hands of the jews physically for decades, can't bring themselves to see the forest for the trees.
I find Eastern Europe in general to be a very complicated place. So many political nuances that most people outside of Eastern Europe wouldn't understand.
Fully agree. When Haz popped up on the scene I was intrigued at first, I genuinely thought that some common ground could be found, but my mistake. I honestly don't know why I ever thought that. Haz has this conspiritard tier analysis of history. And yeah, him and his followers are as anti-white as can be. Which of course they are. Haz is an invader himself. I think what really convinced me was Haz lying about what's going on in South Africa.
Is he Lebanese? Ironic if he is a descendent of Frankish conquistadors.
"For liberals and leftists, only Nazism is real. Politics, left to its own devices, flows and bends in the direction of Nazism. The political spectrum, for them, is defined by gradations of resistance toward this fatal, primal, and vital conclusion."
Such a telling quote. "Left" and "Right" aren't actually about political-economy or any such bloodless questions of prudential procedure. Sinister and Dexter are the Machine against the Organism. Glamour against Beauty. Necromancy against Vitality. Death against Life.
The only question for them is thus: Is it Vital, Primal, and Living? Then it is Fascist and Forbidden!
"Advocates of MAGA Communism start to sound indistinguishable from Alex Jones as they explain how Wehrmacht generals serving in NATO after the Second World War, or Nazi scientists being adopted by the United States, demonstrates some kind of ideological continuity between National Socialism and post-war liberalism. It’s difficult to tell how much they actually believe it and how much they think it’s just a handy way to discredit liberalism to stupid people, but all it accomplishes is making everything stupider."
Are you unfamiliar with the history? It is pretty dumb to call others stupid and making everyone stupider while expressing complete ignorance of the factual and well-documented continuity between the NSDAP and the post-war power elites.
Who do you think funded the Nazis? For that matter, who taught them, who did they learn from? Hitler got funding from America and England, and pretty much everyone who mattered had a stake in him and his government.
https://michelchossudovsky.substack.com/p/history-adolph-hitler-was-financed
As philologist Victor Klemperer wrote, there was hardly a single unique thing about the Nazis and pretty much every word they used, every idea they had, was not original, but had its origins in tiny troupes previously unknown or in German Romanticism, which is also the common origin of both Nazism and Zionism; it is hardly a stretch to make the comparison when one considers that Hitler read from Herzl, who was well-known in Vienna at the time, and got the idea of the "global Jew" from him. Zionists were one of Hitler's biggest influences and without them, there would be no Nazis or Hitler as anyone knows them.
Hitler was also an Anglophile, and the Nazis had countless American and English teachers to learn from regarding their policies and ideology. It is hard to imagine the existence of Nazi eugenicism without the works of the greatest eugenicists that were all British or American, like the Huxleys; UNESCO co-founder Julian even coined the term "transhumanism" the moment eugenicism went out of vogue, and it has the same meaning.
Nazis were pioneers of cybernetic government as well, despite the term not being coined until after WWII by Weiner: “Cybernetics, which I derived from the Greek word Kubernetes, or steersman, the same Greek word from which we eventually derive our word governor.” Cybernetic government is the model system for global government of many so-called liberals, Pierre Trudeau being one of the most famous to openly use the term, as well as of many at institutions of global power like the WEF.
Canadian nationalist Michael Ehret did an excellent series of articles summarising some of the above continuity:
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2021/05/24/how-the-unthinkable-became-thinkable-eric-lander-julian-huxley-and-the-awakening-of-sleeping-monsters/
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2021/05/28/eugenics-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-and-the-clash-of-two-systems/
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2021/05/31/from-russell-and-hilbert-to-wiener-and-harari-the-disturbing-origins-of-cybernetics-and-transhumanism/
The direct continuity and parallels in ideology and governance should really be obvious. The goal was always global governance, using scientism as a tool to create a priestly caste and make people believe "the snow is black" as Lord Bertrand Russell put it, and to control people through it and its advancements. Nazism was a failed experiment that ultimately made things more difficult for the people who funded, taught, and created them, and so they had to rebrand everything, like how Bernays did "propaganda" to "public relations" after Goebbels made it ugly. They are materialist Malthusians who want complete reality control, population control, every kind of control; cybernetic governance.
Of course Western leadership recruited Nazi scientists, and the Wehrmacht leadership to help fight the Russians. They still even support Nazis almost openly, e.g Canada has a war veterans' group for former Nazis that even still has a website, although I doubt many living members, and helps train the Azov Battalion in their ¨fight against the Semite untermenschen." None of this is "conspiracy," but documented historic fact.
And this isn't at all inconsistent with them calling people Nazis, or how they now culture warriors rather than nationalists, because those with real power are amorphous in ideology and will use any beliefs of the public to affirm their own in pursuit of accomplishing their goals. They will survive changes in ideology and adapt, no problem. Under Hitler they were nationalists, today they are globalists: yet they never did believe in states to begin with, seeing them as impedance to effective rule, hence why Wells and others wrote essays against them. Ideology is meant as distraction for the plebs, who are better divided, that way they can go uncontested as they consolidate their rule everywhere and only teach the art of real politics to their own kith and kin.
If you think all this is "conspiracy" for "stupid people" that "makes us stupider", I can only conclude you are not a serious author and are unconcerned with fact.
Maga commies reject both jews and nazis so yes, nazis will seethe. Sorry.
In case you missed that last little bullet point in their "platform" about Epstein and his "associates/Criminals," that would consist of Donald Trump himself as the primary target... This should have been your first clue as to how unserious they are. That and the absurd notion of "abolishing big tech". i understand (but don't agree with) the communist/marxist/woke-ian desire to destroy anything that you can preface with the word "big" but they would be nowhere without big tech, because "little tech" means going back to xeroxing fanzines at Kinko's (an American photocopy store which might have already disappeared) at 3 AM right next to the Jehovah's Witness guy with his bus shelter tracts.
Aside from the confused but innocuous phenomenon of 'maga communism' we have the malignant 'nato nationalism' psyop as a vehicle of subversion.
They have been attacking and trying to deplatform you Keith, personally, for a long time.
Take note and be on your guard:
https://open.substack.com/pub/alog6/p/1
Nothing good about "MAGA Communism". It is merely a Russian operation to undermine America by capturing the populist right.
You guys are retarded for taking it seriously and at face value.
This needed to be said.
Here's hoping that Lavrov and Dugin wake up and realize that these guys are an ideological trap that the American Foreign Policy Establishment is allowing to connect with Russia solely for the purpose of discrediting either dissidents or Tucker and the people who were awakened by his interviews and reporting in Russia.
Here's hoping that this helps as a White Pill for actual Third Position guys.
This will never happen. The Kremlin is anti-White, sadly. Dugin sold out.
Though it is a crying shame that Dugin now takes being anti-nazi personally because of banderites killing his daughter.
"The Kremlin is anti white" this is the faggotry that wignats be talking about in 2024?
Race cuckery is a jewish op so they can point at any criticism of their total domination as actual real nazism. Y'all take the bait.
I’m a Catholic, which means I can’t believe in race. There is only one race that matters. God’s Chosen. Read the Torah.
The Torah, nothing but the original political weapon ancient hebrews invented to ideologically conquer all the ethnos
This will happen. The Kremlin is pro Russian. Dugin likes European Traditionalists.
Why are they persecutioning Russia nationalist?
After carefully considering your point, but knowing full well that you lie out of your ass to such a comical degree that you would call the sky pink even if it were clearly blue, your opinion is to be rejected. Especially when your lack of info (but dearth of Vincent Law, Roy Batty shit stirring) is coupled with your agenda pushing (How's Riley's dick?)
I'll put this up for consideration.
I think the only reason Dugin is looking toward Haz and Hinkle now is because American nationalists have become too anti-Russia in his eyes. But also, American nationalists are retarded. But it's whatever at this point. I don't like the Kremlin, they are clearly anti-nationalist. But I also don't have any love for the ukrainian government either. Even so called nazis in Ukraine are a little weird to say the least. All the jews they have in their groups. Whenever they are interviewed they cuck out and say "oh these are just tattoos. We aren't Nazis, Russia are the real Nazis.".