Michael Tsarion is deeply and naively wrong 'about modern western women will never give up their feminism and will never submit to new society of patriarchary from either native male conquers (White patriarchal western men) or foreign male conquers aka Muslims and other.'
He doesn't understand that People under power conditions and conquests can change their ideological loyalties, principles and viewpoints based on whover is incharged based on not wanting be killed or violently punished by the state/power (Aka the men in Charge)
He doesn't adamit whybdid the feminist project muslim women in Nato occupied Kabul basically abandoned their Curiosity for western feminism and womens rights towards Sharia Patriarchy under the whim of a hat the moment Taliban took sector after sector under fall of kabul in 2021
He doesn't explain how women like my girlfriend who were once staunched fanatical man hating feminists became over time submissive wifes/girlfriends to their new husbands and mirror the same talking points as their boyfriends and husbands state/approve.
He should know from personal experience that nearly all women end up becoming feminine mirrors of their boyfriends and husbands over time whilst disagreeing on the tiniest of subjects and principles.
But instead of that he is utterly naive about it 🤨
Bit disappointing on his part. Other than that I agree with most he said.
Tsarion contradicts himself throughout the entire interview. He starts with his theory that a problem w/ today’s women is that they blindly honor their parents and they do not acknowledge/address the dysfunction/abuse inflicted upon them by their parents during childhood. He goes on to say that if a woman does not have a good relationship with their mother it should be viewed as a major red flag and that he would discourage men from pursuing a relationship w/ a woman who doesn’t have a good relationship with their mother... one would assume someone who views toxic/codependent mothers as the root of the issues plaguing adult women, that he would expect adult women to come to this realization and to distance and/or sever ties with her toxic mother…
He doesn’t clearly define what specific issues are problematic with female r psychology- therefore he is unable to provide solutions and he fails to offer any valuable advice for men of dating age as to how best navigate the complexities of modern dating/relationships.
I recognize that as women we have lost our way and society as suffered tremendously as a result. I agree with almost all of the mainstream grievances regarding “modern women”/feminism, and I always enjoy hearing new takes/analysis on this topic as it is beneficial in my own self reflection. With that said, Tsarion misses the mark, his “psychoanalysis” of women as a whole is just off.. when reading/listening to discussions on this subject I can usually identify with some of the personality flaws/shortcomings discussed- and if it doesn’t apply to me directly, I can usually think of friends/coworkers who it applies to; that was not the case at all with this interview. I have heard far more profound/insightful takes from the likes of Andrew Tate than what was presented by Michael Tsarion in this interview.
Also with Michael I felt he said so many bang on points that almost yelled 'omg yes' whilst listening to this whilst he said so many incorrect statements about human nature and the realities of power that came across as a load male feminist cope.
Like the first statement he said where naively belived that the Likes of Andrew Tate and abusive/ patriarchal men will never force modern women to submit when there are countless examples of that being the opposite case. When the taliban took over afghanistan, the entire population if Afghan women had no choice but become submissive wifes to their islamic husbands. Otherwise they get thrown in cages for crimes of being disloyal to their husbands. There are plenty cases to say that could be the future of western women in Europe if Islam is allowed to take over the entire european continent like a foreign plague unchecked and unresisted. He is so naive that many women want to submit under a oppressive patriarchary and that is completely natural.
I do agree with him that you as a man need to gain knowledge about the basic biological nature women (i.e periods, birth hormones, the nature that women depend on men for survival and its responsibilities) This is stuff I knew when I was 17 because I always liked linking human nature to animal nature.
But I have to say Michael in this interview sounded like he had an angry debate tone like he was debating a sperg on discord/twitch and Keith who may have disagreed with him on many points just remained calm and collected when asking him questions to flesh his viewpoint on. Overall a bit disappointed with Michael on this.
Also his Conspiracy about why feminism is happening sounds less palatble than Chem trail, 5G towers and Fake moon landing Conspiracies. He even mentions the 'Illuminati' ffs... But never mentions the Jews in a guilty lite....
When you get my age at 27 after having previous relationships, dates and sexual encoujters witha variety of women. Women as a sex stop becoming intimidating and complex and actually become more simple the more interactions you have with them and the more you age and mature as a man.
Michael Tsarion is deeply and naively wrong 'about modern western women will never give up their feminism and will never submit to new society of patriarchary from either native male conquers (White patriarchal western men) or foreign male conquers aka Muslims and other.'
He doesn't understand that People under power conditions and conquests can change their ideological loyalties, principles and viewpoints based on whover is incharged based on not wanting be killed or violently punished by the state/power (Aka the men in Charge)
He doesn't adamit whybdid the feminist project muslim women in Nato occupied Kabul basically abandoned their Curiosity for western feminism and womens rights towards Sharia Patriarchy under the whim of a hat the moment Taliban took sector after sector under fall of kabul in 2021
He doesn't explain how women like my girlfriend who were once staunched fanatical man hating feminists became over time submissive wifes/girlfriends to their new husbands and mirror the same talking points as their boyfriends and husbands state/approve.
He should know from personal experience that nearly all women end up becoming feminine mirrors of their boyfriends and husbands over time whilst disagreeing on the tiniest of subjects and principles.
But instead of that he is utterly naive about it 🤨
Bit disappointing on his part. Other than that I agree with most he said.
Tsarion contradicts himself throughout the entire interview. He starts with his theory that a problem w/ today’s women is that they blindly honor their parents and they do not acknowledge/address the dysfunction/abuse inflicted upon them by their parents during childhood. He goes on to say that if a woman does not have a good relationship with their mother it should be viewed as a major red flag and that he would discourage men from pursuing a relationship w/ a woman who doesn’t have a good relationship with their mother... one would assume someone who views toxic/codependent mothers as the root of the issues plaguing adult women, that he would expect adult women to come to this realization and to distance and/or sever ties with her toxic mother…
He doesn’t clearly define what specific issues are problematic with female r psychology- therefore he is unable to provide solutions and he fails to offer any valuable advice for men of dating age as to how best navigate the complexities of modern dating/relationships.
I recognize that as women we have lost our way and society as suffered tremendously as a result. I agree with almost all of the mainstream grievances regarding “modern women”/feminism, and I always enjoy hearing new takes/analysis on this topic as it is beneficial in my own self reflection. With that said, Tsarion misses the mark, his “psychoanalysis” of women as a whole is just off.. when reading/listening to discussions on this subject I can usually identify with some of the personality flaws/shortcomings discussed- and if it doesn’t apply to me directly, I can usually think of friends/coworkers who it applies to; that was not the case at all with this interview. I have heard far more profound/insightful takes from the likes of Andrew Tate than what was presented by Michael Tsarion in this interview.
Also with Michael I felt he said so many bang on points that almost yelled 'omg yes' whilst listening to this whilst he said so many incorrect statements about human nature and the realities of power that came across as a load male feminist cope.
Like the first statement he said where naively belived that the Likes of Andrew Tate and abusive/ patriarchal men will never force modern women to submit when there are countless examples of that being the opposite case. When the taliban took over afghanistan, the entire population if Afghan women had no choice but become submissive wifes to their islamic husbands. Otherwise they get thrown in cages for crimes of being disloyal to their husbands. There are plenty cases to say that could be the future of western women in Europe if Islam is allowed to take over the entire european continent like a foreign plague unchecked and unresisted. He is so naive that many women want to submit under a oppressive patriarchary and that is completely natural.
I do agree with him that you as a man need to gain knowledge about the basic biological nature women (i.e periods, birth hormones, the nature that women depend on men for survival and its responsibilities) This is stuff I knew when I was 17 because I always liked linking human nature to animal nature.
But I have to say Michael in this interview sounded like he had an angry debate tone like he was debating a sperg on discord/twitch and Keith who may have disagreed with him on many points just remained calm and collected when asking him questions to flesh his viewpoint on. Overall a bit disappointed with Michael on this.
Great Podcast ! Thanks for the informative interview
Great interview. I’m going to order his book.
Also his Conspiracy about why feminism is happening sounds less palatble than Chem trail, 5G towers and Fake moon landing Conspiracies. He even mentions the 'Illuminati' ffs... But never mentions the Jews in a guilty lite....
When you get my age at 27 after having previous relationships, dates and sexual encoujters witha variety of women. Women as a sex stop becoming intimidating and complex and actually become more simple the more interactions you have with them and the more you age and mature as a man.