You didn't read any of his breakdowns obviously, considering that most of the information has been proven truthful. You're just being salty.
Gaines' views are therefore largely accurate if that's the case.
You calling ANYONE a "charlatan grifter" is rich considering you cite 'red idealogies' as one of your sources to try and disprove NatSoc.
You're a pot calling the kettle black.
"National Conservative(ism)" is impotent. 'Conservatives' have conserved nothing. Neither can they be considered nationalists as they 'legally' allow the entire world to immigrate here. Is it that innacurate to call you a political atheist given your views?
Woods has disproven most of the claims in the first hour, more to come. It's a literal shit sandwich of memes and lies. You cling to it because you got your silly worldview from this stupid video.
Red Ideologies is full of factual information about natsoc.
"National conservatism" is conservatism (in the social sense) plus nationalism (in the identity sense). It would work great if executed correctly by the right people. Modern "conservative" parties are nothing approaching what I envision for national conservatism. Guilt by association isn't an argument against my worldview.
Again, calling it "disproven" doesn't make it so. I derive my worldview largely from Mein Kampf and other NatSoc sources, not ETLB.
Red Idealogies IS Alex Jones tier schizo.
Yes, and communism would work great "if executed correctly by the right people" according to communists. Your ideological worldview is as much a flight of fantasy as theirs. It's been tried and has failed spectacularly.
National Socialism has been tried and succeeded the first time. So we'll in fact, that in 6 years they pulled Germany out of total destitution. It then took the entire industrialized world another 6 years to completely destroy it.
And I can use MK and Natsoc sources to discredit it as a crypto-communist, Nordicist anti-Slavic ideology. Plenty of objectionable stuff there.
Red Ideologies is nothing close to Alex Jones tier. Name one thing it says that is wrong.
> It's been tried and has failed spectacularly.
That's actually true of National Socialism, which was tried and failed spectacularly. Not to mention is caused the greatest bloodbath in European history due to Hitler's lust for new territory.
> National Socialism has been tried and succeeded the first time.
You think ending up in ruins and the entire leadership either committing suicide or executed at a war crimes trial is a success? That is the standard trajectory of any natsoc regime because it's inherently war-like and imperialistic. It can only bring chaos and death to Europe.
Honestly Keith, I need your BIG project, with your channel down from yt, and irish and american elections having passed, is to make a refined version of Europa the Last Battle, with Corrected and New Information. You can organise it, but get more people on the Dissident Right to help you. I think it would be EPIC!
I confirm from experience this stuff about J women.
When I became famous & good looking with it, top young fertile J women of the capital began circling around me. Later on in NY one of them fixed for me a $10,000 grant through her connections, including a letter of recommendation from a Harvard prof. The grant was from a George Soros foundation, I didn't know who he was, it was the 1980s, I just took ten grand, like a young writer should.
This series is a real service.
The whole doc is a compilation of 4chan tier internet memes. This is where morons like Stew Peters and Myron Gains get their worldview from.
Seeing as that most of the information in the series is true, it's hardly a meme now is it?
I highly doubt Gains has even watched Europa. At least Peters HAS a worldview. Political atheists like yourself shouldn't ever be taken seriously.
Woods is proving here that most of the information is false or distorted in some way. Did you even read the article?
Gaines cited Europa for his views on WW2/Hitler.
Stew Peters is an Alex Jones-tier charlatan grifter. Extremely low-IQ.
Political atheist? That doesn't even make sense.
You didn't read any of his breakdowns obviously, considering that most of the information has been proven truthful. You're just being salty.
Gaines' views are therefore largely accurate if that's the case.
You calling ANYONE a "charlatan grifter" is rich considering you cite 'red idealogies' as one of your sources to try and disprove NatSoc.
You're a pot calling the kettle black.
"National Conservative(ism)" is impotent. 'Conservatives' have conserved nothing. Neither can they be considered nationalists as they 'legally' allow the entire world to immigrate here. Is it that innacurate to call you a political atheist given your views?
Woods has disproven most of the claims in the first hour, more to come. It's a literal shit sandwich of memes and lies. You cling to it because you got your silly worldview from this stupid video.
Red Ideologies is full of factual information about natsoc.
"National conservatism" is conservatism (in the social sense) plus nationalism (in the identity sense). It would work great if executed correctly by the right people. Modern "conservative" parties are nothing approaching what I envision for national conservatism. Guilt by association isn't an argument against my worldview.
Again, calling it "disproven" doesn't make it so. I derive my worldview largely from Mein Kampf and other NatSoc sources, not ETLB.
Red Idealogies IS Alex Jones tier schizo.
Yes, and communism would work great "if executed correctly by the right people" according to communists. Your ideological worldview is as much a flight of fantasy as theirs. It's been tried and has failed spectacularly.
National Socialism has been tried and succeeded the first time. So we'll in fact, that in 6 years they pulled Germany out of total destitution. It then took the entire industrialized world another 6 years to completely destroy it.
And I can use MK and Natsoc sources to discredit it as a crypto-communist, Nordicist anti-Slavic ideology. Plenty of objectionable stuff there.
Red Ideologies is nothing close to Alex Jones tier. Name one thing it says that is wrong.
> It's been tried and has failed spectacularly.
That's actually true of National Socialism, which was tried and failed spectacularly. Not to mention is caused the greatest bloodbath in European history due to Hitler's lust for new territory.
> National Socialism has been tried and succeeded the first time.
You think ending up in ruins and the entire leadership either committing suicide or executed at a war crimes trial is a success? That is the standard trajectory of any natsoc regime because it's inherently war-like and imperialistic. It can only bring chaos and death to Europe.
Honestly Keith, I need your BIG project, with your channel down from yt, and irish and american elections having passed, is to make a refined version of Europa the Last Battle, with Corrected and New Information. You can organise it, but get more people on the Dissident Right to help you. I think it would be EPIC!
Jewish Bolshevism. A useful meme for distracting the populist right from global capitalism, and nothing more.
Trump’s Administration contains more Jews than the first Soviet government.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jews-in-donald-trump-administration
That film always felt like some cheap dishonest agitprop
Clearly most of it is true though.
To anybody keeping score on this, the doc is batting like 50% accuracy?
They should have made it half as long then lol
I confirm from experience this stuff about J women.
When I became famous & good looking with it, top young fertile J women of the capital began circling around me. Later on in NY one of them fixed for me a $10,000 grant through her connections, including a letter of recommendation from a Harvard prof. The grant was from a George Soros foundation, I didn't know who he was, it was the 1980s, I just took ten grand, like a young writer should.
This dynamics seems typical among Western elites.
idk man i'm as a.s. as they come but some of them broads god damn it. couldn't blame old uncle Joe if it was just constantly being thrown @ him.