Yarvin supports only monstrous, multicultural empires, and despises the ethnostate as a form of organizing, he thinks that we should all be peasants happy to be ruled by a "lord" like himself or some other Dark Elven idiots, like Thiel, Elon, Trump.
Also, it would be deceitful to exclude his obvious fear that once an ethnic project is started in Europe, his kind will be outsiders yet again and forbidden to take part.
Where did he openly advocated for multicultural empires ? Also all empires are multicultural but itβs multiculturalism quite different than the one we have now in our nation states.
Thanks for including my post, Keith. We always run the risk of letting our enemies and supposed allies define and dismiss us with their simplistic, cookie-cutter understanding. Keep up the excellent work.
You should have mentioned that the USSR supported the creation of the state of Israel and Israel itself until the 1960s. Ask him if Jewish nationalism is also a catspaw of the international left.
Is false to say Israel is right wing, because it believes in micro ingroup manifest destiny against all odds. Sure its right wing for them. But for Isreali to even be right wing, it naturally has to be anti white/ europeon. Its white wing arguments hinge on the fulcrum of being anti europeon. The only right wing Jewish literate is post 1960s zionism, but its also all anti white/ europeon.
Curtis Yarvin is a troon and a court eunuch for Silicon Valley. His whole class (NRX types, old manosphere) have never done anything, thatβs the thing to remember, an entire class of contrarian know it alls, each striving to be the most βreactionaryβ. Coffee shop theorycels, so afraid of actually trying to do something theyβve invented the all powerful elite bogeyman to justify not only being useless, but why you should be too. He is not our friend.
NRx spent 15 years trying to beg Chinese and Indian tech migrants to not fall into the Anne Frank Rosa Parks Industrial complex. With an open letter such as βWhy I am not a white supremacistβ. Only for all that work to be taken in one day by the βAmerican partyβ which is a composite of said immigrants who are indeed supremacist for their own ingroup wearing centrism as a costume.
Yarvin is correct. The confusion stems from the conflict between Irish Nationalism (often based) and Irish Republicanism (often progressive/communist). Irish Nationalism does/did contain both anti-liberal and anti-imperialist strains, but Irish Republicanism kept the anti-imperialist strains while EMBRACING liberal/progressive causes. Yarvinβs genealogy of Sinn Fein shitlibism is basically correct. If you were a liberal/progressive/communist in the 19th century, 9 times out of 10, you supported Irish Nationalism and likely Irish Republicanism, too. Shelley, Byron, Marx, Engels, Trotsky etc all supported this cause. And donβt even get me started on Wolfe Tone and the French Revolution.
this can be all true, but it has not potency if you deny the Jewish element of the left and do everything you can to hide. It being the most potent form of the left. There is no Irish Black alliance, there is no Quaker black alliance. Harvard was publishing βend the white raceβ in their news paper under jewish authors. Not Anglos, Ellis islanders, ect..
The great thing about Yarvin is that, because he has become lazy, anyone who knows anything about any topic can best him in argument, but he is obviously correct about Irish Independence and Keith Woods is in hard Cope mode and is just resorting to Judaic pilpul about what the true 'core' of Irish nationalism is. Cool story bro, but look out the window.
Yarvin supports only monstrous, multicultural empires, and despises the ethnostate as a form of organizing, he thinks that we should all be peasants happy to be ruled by a "lord" like himself or some other Dark Elven idiots, like Thiel, Elon, Trump.
Also, it would be deceitful to exclude his obvious fear that once an ethnic project is started in Europe, his kind will be outsiders yet again and forbidden to take part.
TL;DR - fuck off Yarvin.
Surprise Surprise a Jewish Rat π showing there true colours.
What I was going to say.
Where did he openly advocated for multicultural empires ? Also all empires are multicultural but itβs multiculturalism quite different than the one we have now in our nation states.
He is the modern version of Isreal Zangwiller and the melting pot. Even looks just like him
Thanks for including my post, Keith. We always run the risk of letting our enemies and supposed allies define and dismiss us with their simplistic, cookie-cutter understanding. Keep up the excellent work.
Thanks for everything you do Keith.
Highly recommend people buy your book.
Itβs nationalism for me not for thee.
Heβs been insufferable for so long.
These people will never βgetβ us and frankly, I donβt care if they do.
Well done Keith, the silence from Yarvin is deafening.
You should have mentioned that the USSR supported the creation of the state of Israel and Israel itself until the 1960s. Ask him if Jewish nationalism is also a catspaw of the international left.
He would probably say yes
Is false to say Israel is right wing, because it believes in micro ingroup manifest destiny against all odds. Sure its right wing for them. But for Isreali to even be right wing, it naturally has to be anti white/ europeon. Its white wing arguments hinge on the fulcrum of being anti europeon. The only right wing Jewish literate is post 1960s zionism, but its also all anti white/ europeon.
Curtis Yarvin is a troon and a court eunuch for Silicon Valley. His whole class (NRX types, old manosphere) have never done anything, thatβs the thing to remember, an entire class of contrarian know it alls, each striving to be the most βreactionaryβ. Coffee shop theorycels, so afraid of actually trying to do something theyβve invented the all powerful elite bogeyman to justify not only being useless, but why you should be too. He is not our friend.
NRx spent 15 years trying to beg Chinese and Indian tech migrants to not fall into the Anne Frank Rosa Parks Industrial complex. With an open letter such as βWhy I am not a white supremacistβ. Only for all that work to be taken in one day by the βAmerican partyβ which is a composite of said immigrants who are indeed supremacist for their own ingroup wearing centrism as a costume.
What would you define as βold manosphere?β Whatβs improved about the new version ?
Ohhhh ok. I think I see what youβre saying. People who put into practice over endless theory writing.
We need such White advocates like you.
Yarvin is a Jew β‘οΈbtw
Yarvin is a dirty Jew. Nuff' said.
A long winded way to say he is a Jew. :-)
Yarvin is literally a Jew. He can take his "spiritually brown," and shove it up his kike ass.
Lame infertile discourse which lacks Christ as it center and thus cannot bring anything good.
Old moldy Jew books are nothing but propaganda for Jewish supremacy.
A Jew shill and an actual Jew--this is called controlling the narrative.
Yarvin is correct. The confusion stems from the conflict between Irish Nationalism (often based) and Irish Republicanism (often progressive/communist). Irish Nationalism does/did contain both anti-liberal and anti-imperialist strains, but Irish Republicanism kept the anti-imperialist strains while EMBRACING liberal/progressive causes. Yarvinβs genealogy of Sinn Fein shitlibism is basically correct. If you were a liberal/progressive/communist in the 19th century, 9 times out of 10, you supported Irish Nationalism and likely Irish Republicanism, too. Shelley, Byron, Marx, Engels, Trotsky etc all supported this cause. And donβt even get me started on Wolfe Tone and the French Revolution.
this can be all true, but it has not potency if you deny the Jewish element of the left and do everything you can to hide. It being the most potent form of the left. There is no Irish Black alliance, there is no Quaker black alliance. Harvard was publishing βend the white raceβ in their news paper under jewish authors. Not Anglos, Ellis islanders, ect..
The great thing about Yarvin is that, because he has become lazy, anyone who knows anything about any topic can best him in argument, but he is obviously correct about Irish Independence and Keith Woods is in hard Cope mode and is just resorting to Judaic pilpul about what the true 'core' of Irish nationalism is. Cool story bro, but look out the window.